Archive for the ‘Governance’ Category

Irish Aid report exposes Malawi govt’s wretched communications system

Good news is that the Irish government has pledged its continued support to Malawi in the areas of nutrition, enhance food security, though ‘crop productivity and diversification’ and good governance, according to Irish Aid’s report: “Malawi Country Strategy Paper 2010 – 2014″.

The paper shows that the Irish government support for these programmes will jump almost two-fold in 5 years; from €10.160 million in 2009 to €19.000 million in 2014. Bad news is that the paper has exposed a gap in Malawi government communications system. One of the programmes the Irish government and its partners are looking to assist in is the now postponed Local Government Elections. The strategy paper says:

Following the conduct of peaceful, well-organised presidential and parliamentary elections in 2009, Irish Aid, together with other development partners will assist the Malawi Electoral Commission with the local government elections planned for 2011. Support for these elections will be complemented by activities to strengthen the district assemblies and services through financing the Local Development Fund and the Local Government Service Charter.

The Irish government has provided support and assistance to Malawi since 2002. The Irish embassy was opened in the capital Lilongwe in 2007. This shows that other than financial support, the Irish have a very good presence in Malawi, which makes it even more bizarre that the Irish government is not aware (judging from this report) of the cancellation of the Local Government Elections. Among the 40+ Malawi cabinet ministers is a minister of information, and there is Office of President and Cabinet, shouldn’t people in these departments start earning their wages? Do we also need western folks to train us how to communicate?

See the full report – pdf

International Development, Andrew Mitchell, to Malawi president, Bingu wa Mutharika.

Dear Mr President

We recently agreed that Malawi should be one of 27 priority countries for future UK development support. Stephen O’Brien discussed our future plans with you in January, and confirmed them in his letter of 24 February to your Finance Minister. But as you know, following your expulsion of our High Commissioner, we’re reviewing the wider relationship with Malawi. Before I make decisions on the future of the aid programme, I would welcome your views on the concerns set out in this letter. Until I have completed my consideration of these issues, following your response, I will not be making any budget commitments to Malawi.

Our partnership is based on a commitment to poverty reduction, respect for human rights and accountability and sound public financial management. Malawi’s economy has grown well in recent years, and good progress has been made on maize production and against some of the MDGs. But major development challenges remain and I am concerned that some of the policies of your government may jeopardise progress in reducing poverty.

First, there are growing risks to the Malawi economy, which if not urgently addressed will seriously limit progress in reducing poverty. Malawi’s chronic foreign exchange shortages are having a very serious impact on the private sector, which should be driving future growth. Declining global demand for tobacco combined with rising fuel and fertiliser prices also suggest a serious terms of trade shock for Malawi. In the short term this requires some changes to economic policy agreed with the IMF. In the short term export competitiveness, power shortages, high transport and finance costs and skills gaps need to be addressed. These issues are all covered by joint work between your government and the development partners, but I’m unclear what action you propose to take. As a relatively small and landlocked country, there are opportunities to take advantage of regional integration of transport and power. Again I am not sure of your government’s intentions.

Second, on human rights and domestic accountability, I welcome the greater transparency and accountability around the national budget and consultations to inform the new Malawi Growth and Development Strategy. But there have been a number of worrying developments over the last eighteen months. Reports that demonstrations have been suppressed and civil society organisations intimidated indicate that space for normal democratic debate is narrowing and that tolerance for opposition voices, and for organisations that can help to hold the government to account, is declining. Stephen O’Brien raised with you in January our concerns about the implications of the revised Penal Code for freedom of expression and minority rights. We are extremely disappointed to learn that this Bill was signed into law shortly afterwards and that homosexuality between women will be criminalised. I hope also that we can work together to ensure that institutions, such as the National Audit Office, the Anti Corruption Bureau, the Ombudsman and the Malawi Human Rights Commission, are given the necessary independence and financial support to do their jobs and provide a formal avenue for Malawians seeking redress.

Third, on public financial management, I remain concerned about the use of scarce public resources for luxury items, including the $22 million plane in 2009 and continued purchase of expensive cars. As you will recall, the UK deducted 3 million pounds of general budget support in 2009 and recently reclaimed 500,000 pounds following evidence of poor value procurements in the health sector. I understand that reviews of fertiliser and road procurement highlight opportunities for major savings. At a time of austerity in the UK when the Coalition Government has agreed to continue increasing the aid budget, I need to be able to assure British taxpayers that partner governments are using our resources, and theirs to deliver better results in reducing poverty. I would welcome reassurance on your commitment to value for money and details of your next steps.

Fourth, I was disappointed with the Government’s slow and limited response to the hunger faced by many families in Southern Malawi, following localised droughts in 2009/10, especially given the assurances I received last November. This weak response undermines the Government’s very positive record in improving food security at the national level.

I look forward to your response on all of these issues, which are fundamental to our future partnership. I would like to reassure you that we respect Malawi’s right to shape its own policies. But you will understand that I also have responsibilities to the British taxpayer to ensure that their money is used to reduce poverty in the most effective way. I will be making decisions on the UK’s development programme in Malawi by the end of June. I would like to take account of your answer to this letter and would be happy to discuss the concerns in this letter with you. I also intend to consult Malawi’s other development partners. The Foreign Secretary, the Right Hon William Hague, will be interested in your reply as he considers other aspects of the UK’s relationship with Malawi.

With best regards

Yours sincerely

ANDREW MITCHELL
SECRETARY OF STATE, DEPARTMENT FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CC
Hon Prof Etta Banda MP, Minister of Foreign Affairs
Hon Ken Kandodo MP, Minister of Finance
Hon Abbie Shawa MP, Minister of Development Planning and Cooperation

Africans know what they want, listen to them

“[It is] time to avoid the dictatorship v democracy debate in Africa… For good governance in Africa we should be thinking more about alternatives to the agenda that western donors have been pushing since 1989, writes David Booth, ODI’s Head of Africa, Power and Politics Programme.”

No, David. You’ve got this upside down.

First of all, it is not for Western aid and development workers to decide right debates for Africa and its ‘development’, Africans know exactly what they want. The current political events indicate that people want much more than ‘development’: they want freedom. This will not come with centralised systems of government. It will come with democratic governments where people have a real say in how their governments are run and have their grievances attended to. This is the only basis for lasting stability. Development cannot take place without stability.

To suggest that the current “democratic” regimes in Africa are there as a result of the West’s post 1989 democratic agenda is not only patronising but also disrespectful to people who fought, and are continuing to fight, against dictatorial regimes on the continent. And the battle is not over, from Cairo to Malawi, Uganda to Burkina Faso, people are still fighting for their rights.

The move towards democracy in many African countries in the 1990s happened at the backdrop of decades of colonialism and dictatorship. It is inconceivable that these countries were expected to establish themselves, democratically within two decades. Sticking with dictators is not an option, people want to have a say. It’s time to start listening to the people’s wants and model “your” [as you're addressing yourself as "we"] development programmes around people’s desires. Listen and talk to them – they will respond; they have feelings!

NOTE: a part of this article was posted as a comment on the original piece on Guardian website.